| Project/Area Number |
17320051
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
ヨーロッパ語系文学
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Keio University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
OMIYA Kanichiro Keio University, Faculty of Letters, 教授 (40233267)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
IZUMI Masato Keio University, Faculty of Letters, Faculty of Letters (40159801)
FURNKAS Josef Keio University, Faculty of Letters, Faculty of Letters (40306858)
KUMEKAWA Mario Keio University, Faculty of Letters, Faculty of Letters (00317504)
HIRATA Eiichiro Keio University, Faculty of Letters, Faculty of Letters (00286600)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2005 – 2007
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2007)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥13,500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥12,300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,200,000)
Fiscal Year 2007: ¥5,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,200,000)
Fiscal Year 2006: ¥4,000,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,000,000)
Fiscal Year 2005: ¥4,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,300,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | German Literature / Theory of digital Media / Cultural Studies / International Cooperation / Germany / メディア研究 / 思想史 / 独文学 / 表象文化 / 美学 / デジタル・メディア / 芸術批評 / 翻訳 / 文化比較 / 大学論 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
The aim of the project was to investigate the transformation of social meanings of literary works and arts in the era of digital media from the end of the 20th to the beginning of the 21st century. Firstly the achievements were done in our monographical studies about literary or artistic phenomena that describe the historical process of such transformation which involves the deliberation form the traditional form of production and reception of arts. Secondly some of our studies could give an outline of ethical tasks literary works and arts are to take in their technical and social contradiction today, i.e. that the digitally operated media community extends principally globally across the board, while its particular emergences and forms seem to be nevertheless contingent on very diverse conventionally determined culture. However, this polarity itself is of a media-mediated nature and not the same antagonism any more as such of 'innovation and tradition'. Literary works and arts today can be interpreted as an expression of the polarizing effect of digital media. Thirdly, as the practice of intercultural communication we have had six opportunities of international symposia, where we exchanged opinions with the German scholars.
|
