| Project/Area Number |
17500458
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Sports science
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Matsue National College of Technology |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
MORITA Masatoshi Matsue National College of Technology, Department of Humanities, Associate professor, 人文科学科, 助教授 (60259918)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
MORIYAMA Yasuyuki Matsue National College of Technology, Department of Humanities, Associate professor, 人文科学科, 助教授 (50270319)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2005 – 2006
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2006)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,400,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,400,000)
Fiscal Year 2006: ¥1,700,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,700,000)
Fiscal Year 2005: ¥1,700,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,700,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | Movement to return / Motion analysis / Agility / Speed endurance / Shuttle run / Control test / 短距離走 / 緩加速走 / 球技 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
I assigned a focus to a ball game (soccer, rugby, handball and a basketball) that running speed maintenance ability had an influence on a performance and was able to show one of the useful measurement items for ability grasp by carrying out "a run to turn down in succession". I let I agreed with shuttle run you intended for a player of a wide competition level, and to evaluate aerobic ability and perform "a run to turn down in succession" as exercise to maintain running speed at the maximum and was able to get a fundamental document to evaluate running speed continuance ability to be concrete.
An experiment : I measured the total time that 8 and 1/2 went to 15m section and return in succession and I distinguished it in "run time" and "turn time" in the case and measured it.
The total time which I measured by a competition level had a meaningful difference. However, there was not a difference by a competition level for "run time", and what a difference of "turn time" influenced greatly in total time became clear. In "turn time", the first half did not have a partial (slowdown situation time) difference either, and a difference of (acceleration situation time) was big, and what I influenced became clear for the latter half.
I elucidated good movement to turn down of exercise efficiency by performing analysis of three dimensions about movement to turn down. It became clear that it was important to let body center of gravity speed slow down by letting you do flexure of the left knee joint before one step to turn down quickly. This movement was an important point to let acceleration movement (quick extension of the left knee joint) to continue shift smoothly.
|
