International Comparative Studies on Accounting System Change from Viewpoint of Institutional Theories
Project/Area Number |
17530337
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Accounting
|
Research Institution | Kyoto University |
Principal Investigator |
FUJII Hideki Kyoto University, Graduate School of Economics, Professor (80173392)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2005 – 2007
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2007)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥3,800,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2007: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2006: ¥1,100,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000)
Fiscal Year 2005: ¥1,400,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000)
|
Keywords | international accounting / convergence of accounting standards / conceptual framework / institutional theory / comparative institutional analysis / 会計基準のコンバージェンス / 会計制度 / 制度変化 / 非営利組織 / 会計の国際的調和化 / 財務会計の概念フレームワーク / 公益法人会計基準 / 原価主義会計 / 減損会計 / プラン・コンタブル |
Research Abstract |
The research aims at theoretical analysis of accounting system change, accompanying highly complex, dynamic, and sometimes even contradictory aspects, observed for years, especially since 2000, in global economy. The most illustrative example may he a proposal by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) that they would make comprehensive income (= net income + window fall) a unique performance measure by eliminating net income from income statement The empirical research, however, has commonly been reported that net income is more relevant than comprehensive income in terms of predictive value of stock prices. We try to find out the elements that drive this orientation of system change in accounting, and to give theoretically consistent explanation to the accounting change that on the surface appears to be in opposition to needs of information users. Our conclusion is that we can explain theory-consistently the accounting change mentioned above by applying to our research some basic ideas and concepts of the Comparative Institutional Analysis (CIA), such as belief of standard setters as monopoly decision-makers, understanding of actual state by citizens with bounded rationality, and mutual action of players formulated in evolutionary game theory. The emphasis on institutional charades of social rules in the CIA shares an underlying research focus with the notion of "general acceptance" of standards in accounting. This enables us to apply the CIA to our accounting research, and to this extent, our research results may be showing us a new frontier of study in this field. One of the most remarkable results of our research is a publication of a book, Institutional Perspective on System Change in Accounting: With Special Reference to International Convergence of Accounting Standards, Chuokeizai Publisher Co., 246p. 2007.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(28 results)