| Project/Area Number |
17592306
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Community health/Gerontological nurisng
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Saitama prefectural university |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
NOGAWA Tomoe Saitama Prefectural University, School of Health & Social Services, Professor, 保健医療福祉学部, 教授 (20104987)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
SAKAI Michihisa Saitama Prefectural University, School of Health & Social Services, Assistant Professor, 保健医療福祉学部, 助教授 (30196050)
NONAKA Miho Saitama Prefectural University, School of Health & Social Services, Assistant, 保健医療福祉学部, 助手 (60404927)
OKUYAMA Takahiro Saitama Prefectural University, Junior College, Assistant, 短期大学部, 助手 (70412997)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2005 – 2006
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2006)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,200,000)
Fiscal Year 2006: ¥1,600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,600,000)
Fiscal Year 2005: ¥1,600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,600,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | art therapy / care family / self-help group / Dementia of early stage / younger dementia / support for community |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
1. Introduction
The purpose of this study offered a place of mutual interchange to dementia of early stage and younger dementia (as objects) and a care family by art therapy. We observed the development as a self-help group of care families and tried intervention of art therapy aimed for promotion of social participation of objects and improvement of psychology / behavioral disorder for two years.
2. Methods
We offered a place of mutual interchange by art therapy and evaluated changes such as a recognition function of objects, ADL, QOL by observation. We performed group interview while performing counseling to the family who took care of the formation of a self-help group for a purpose. It was period:2005.8〜2006.12.
3. Results and Discussion
As a result of having carried out art therapy to objects for six months, (1) In everyday life, maintenance / improvement of aggressiveness / initiative was confirmed. (2) It can be expected an effect by intervention in a slight illness or a medium grade symptom. (3) The opportunity that found a new role of a person of object was possible by art therapy. (4) Existence of a person who experienced care functioned as a consultant. And they became a role model as a care family.
4. Conclusion
Art therapy was (1) effective as a place of mutual interchange and functioned as of productive and a progressive place. (2) It let the psychological side activate. (3) It promotes social participation. (4) By an offer of an affirmative place, It kept emotion of a person of object stability. And It affected relationship between objects and their family. In future, We plan environmental substantiality and maintenance to continue art therapy. We want to build a consultation function and a role function, and to do a proposal to a policy.
|
