• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to previous page

Reconstruction of Criminality : Institution and Criminal Law

Research Project

Project/Area Number 17K03429
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)

Allocation TypeMulti-year Fund
Section一般
Research Field Criminal law
Research InstitutionKobe University

Principal Investigator

Oda Naoki  神戸大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (10194557)

Project Period (FY) 2017-04-01 – 2020-03-31
Project Status Completed (Fiscal Year 2019)
Budget Amount *help
¥2,990,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥690,000)
Fiscal Year 2019: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2018: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Keywords可罰性 / 二次規範性 / 制度侵害 / 法益侵害 / 特別背任罪 / 法益侵害説 / 刑法の解釈 / 制度論 / 背任罪 / 担保権侵害 / 刑法の本質 / 社会制度 / 刑法学の方法 / 刑事法 / 刑法の二次規範性
Outline of Final Research Achievements

Punishment must be supported by Criminality of conduct, Criminality is founded on "Harm to others", and normal theory has expressed Harm as an actual attack to individual Interest. But punishment is a final reaction by Official, therefore crime must have made greater damage than tort only reacted in civil procedures. How can we assess the damage as appropriate to Criminality ? On this research I represented that we had better assess the damage to the social, our fundamental norm of cooperation, also our social "Institution". Harm principle is important for responsibility of citizen too. Our assessment based on individual Interest is so not enough significant for Criminality. Civil law and formal official law construct social order in establishing Institutions as first order rules, man become citizen in cooperating along norm expressed by form of Institutions, and punishment must be founded on social damage of social norm. Criminal Law support the social as second order rule.

Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements

法解釈論争が法社会学から法政策学に及ぶ幅で展開されたとき,刑法学は,微妙な距離を採ったままで,「秩序維持」という白地手形は捨てて法益侵害説を共有し,機能主義の思考方法で解釈の実質化を図った。その結果,「可罰性」は程度問題とみなされ,「公序」との関係は棚上げされたに等しい。
本研究では,「制度」レベルに社会との接点を確立して,刑法学(可罰性論)を構成し直すことを目指した。社会学・経済学の「制度論」から学び,法秩序の多層的・可変的な構造を描き,周辺科学との協働のあり方を探り,法律学一般や「公序」との関係を再確認した。謙抑主義の下で孤立化しかねない刑法学を,その基底部分から組み直す意味がある。

Report

(4 results)
  • 2019 Annual Research Report   Final Research Report ( PDF )
  • 2018 Research-status Report
  • 2017 Research-status Report
  • Research Products

    (5 results)

All 2019 2018 2017

All Journal Article (3 results) (of which Open Access: 2 results) Presentation (2 results)

  • [Journal Article] 特別背任罪の一考察-制度論を取り込んだ刑法解釈の試み-(2)2019

    • Author(s)
      小田直樹
    • Journal Title

      神戸法学雑誌

      Volume: 69巻3号 Pages: 1-33

    • NAID

      120006796501

    • Related Report
      2019 Annual Research Report
    • Open Access
  • [Journal Article] 特別背任罪の一考察-制度論を取り込んだ刑法解釈の試み-(1)2019

    • Author(s)
      小田直樹
    • Journal Title

      神戸法学雑誌

      Volume: 68(4)

    • Related Report
      2018 Research-status Report
  • [Journal Article] 法益侵害説について2017

    • Author(s)
      小田直樹
    • Journal Title

      神戸法学年報

      Volume: 31号 Pages: 1-35

    • NAID

      40021625067

    • Related Report
      2017 Research-status Report
    • Open Access
  • [Presentation] 過失犯の緊急避難:結果回避可能性の扱い方2018

    • Author(s)
      小田直樹
    • Organizer
      神戸判例刑事法研究会
    • Related Report
      2017 Research-status Report
  • [Presentation] 法益侵害説の効用と限界について2017

    • Author(s)
      小田直樹
    • Organizer
      中四国法政学会
    • Related Report
      2017 Research-status Report

URL: 

Published: 2017-04-28   Modified: 2021-02-19  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi