A study on preferential obligations in bankruptcy
| Project/Area Number |
17K03447
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Civil law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | University of Tsukuba |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
NAOI Yoshinori 筑波大学, ビジネスサイエンス系, 准教授 (20448343)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2017-04-01 – 2020-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2019)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,290,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥990,000)
Fiscal Year 2019: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2018: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 物上代位 / 流質 / 質権 / 慣行 / 所有権留保 / 先取特権 / 信託 / 物的代位 / 集合物 / 担保 / 倒産 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
In the French theory of the transformation of collective property collateral, subrogation has gradually been used to explain the continuance of the security effect. Subrogation is not considered as a fiction but the representation of intention of the parties.
Through the analysis of Japanese practice survey, edict and Supreme Court cases, the abolition of the forclosure which would protect pledger was not accepted easily and this is because the redemption enables the pledger to continue cultivation.
|
| Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements |
フランスにおいて物上代位論の根拠づけが擬制から当事者の意思へと変容してきたこと、しかもそれが集合物の構成要素について論じられた点を明らかにすることを通じ、流動型担保の説明概念としての分析論と集合物論とを統合する可能性が見いだされる。
また、流質禁止の緩和はフランスにも見られるところであるが、手続費用の節減という観点ばかりでなく受戻可能性を残しておくことで、担保権を実行しつつも設定者の事業を継続させる道を見出しうる点で、社会的意義を有する。
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(6 results)
