Budget Amount *help |
¥4,680,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,080,000)
Fiscal Year 2019: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2018: ¥1,690,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥390,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
|
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
Endocervical glandular hyperplasia (LEGH), 36 adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and 66 invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma (ECA) samples were immunohistochemically analyzed using cell lineage‐specific markers. All LEGHs were categorized as gastric-type. The AISs and ECAs were classified as gastric (5.6%/22.7%), intestinal (27.8/13.6), gastrointestinal (8.3/10.6), Mullerian-type (50/34.8), and NOS (8.3/18.2). TFF1, TFF2, and TFF3 in cervical discharge were measured by ELISA. Both TFF1/TFF3 and TFF2/TFF3 in LEGH group [(TFF1/TFF3, 3.18‰ (IQR, 1.87‰-6.04‰); TFF2/TFF3, 4.95 (1.70-10.37)] were significantly higher than those in non‐neoplastic group (TFF1/TFF3, 0.10 (0.04-0.30); TFF2/TFF3, 0.57 (0.28-1.33) According to ROC analysis, the optimal cut-off values of TFF1/TFF3 and TFF2/TFF3 in the discrimination between LEGH patients and non-tumor patients were 0.58‰ (sensitivity, 93.8%; specificity, 86.2%) and 1.57‰ (sensitivity, 78.1%; specificity, 78.1%), respectively.
|