| Project/Area Number |
18500547
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Applied health science
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Ehime University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
ASAI Hidenori Ehime University, National University Corporation, Faculty of Education, Professor (50175824)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
KOHNO Hiroshi Toyo University, Faculty of human Life Design, Associate Professor (20408975)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2006 – 2007
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2007)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,930,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2007: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2006: ¥2,500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,500,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | resistance train / machine training / elderly / physical fitness / questionnaire survey / 質問紙調査 / 第三者評価 / 運動処方 / 老化 / 筋力向上 / 高齢者 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
The purpose of this investigation was to inspect the validity of the muscle strength training undertaking which a training machine for the elderly was used for.
The research content performed before and after for training period (3months) were assessments of bodies such as a physical fitness and ADL, mentalities such as subjective euphoria, eptitude feelings, and depression, and third person assessment.
Comparison with this machine training lesson and other lessons was performed. Many improvements were seen in the physical fitness test results that carried out before and after three months in all lessons. When these categories were compared with the group (Weak MTG) which carried out machine training and the other groups, the clear differences was not recognized.
In the questionnaire survey, as for the category that an improvements were accepted, the clear differences were not recognized between a Weak MTG and the other groups. The clear differences were not recognized between Weak MTG and the other groups in the third person assessment either.
Based upon the foregoing, the clear improvements were recognized in the physical fitness test of all groups and many categories of questionnaire survey in around 3 months, but the superiority of the training lesson where a training machine was used for wasn't able to be found.
Because all lessons were finished in 2007, follow-up survey of the lesson participants has been carried out now.
|
