| Project/Area Number |
18592382
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Clinical nursing
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Osaka Prefecture University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
MORI Kazue Osaka Prefecture University, 看護学部, 教授 (10210113)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
KONO Ayumi 大阪市立大学, 大学院・看護学研究科, 教授 (00313255)
KOJIMA Misako 聖隷クリストファー大学, 看護学部, 教授 (50035333)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
SUGIMOTO Tomoko 神奈川県立保健福祉大学, 看護学部, 講師 (00314922)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2006 – 2009
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2009)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,280,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥780,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2008: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2007: ¥1,950,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥450,000)
Fiscal Year 2006: ¥900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 造血幹細胞移植 / 患者支援プログラム / 看護学 / がん / 移植・再生医療 / 患者教育 / 準実験 / 介入研究 / POMS / 自己決定 / 癌 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
The objectives of the present study were to develop "a patient support program for patients to receive blood stem cell transplantation on their own initiative", using a cognitive education theory based on intrinsic motivation ; to actually introduce the program into clinical practice ; and to evaluate its effectiveness. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was performed using the Japanese versions of POMS and MAC before the start of intervention, after the termination of intervention, and 2 weeks after intervention between the non-intervention and intervention groups. The vigor subscale of the Japanese version of POMS showed a significant tendency of interaction with "at the time of response" and "the presence or absence of intervention" (p<0.1). We confirmed the changes in vigor in each group using Dunnett's multiple comparison method, which suggested that the non-intervention group had a gradual decline in vigor for transplantation, whereas the intervention group could maintain vigor for transplantation.
|
