| Project/Area Number |
19520455
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Japanese language education
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Nagoya University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
NOGUCHI Hiroyuki Nagoya University, 大学院・教育発達科学研究科, 教授 (60114815)
|
|---|
| Research Collaborator |
SHOJI Yoshio お茶の水女子大学, 国際教育センター, 前教授 (40253017)
KOBAYASHI Kumiko 神田外語大学, 留学生別科, 非常勤講師
HORIKAWA Yumi 国際交流基金・日本語試験センター, 研究員
WADA Akiko 元国際交流基金・日本語試験センター, 研究員
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2007 – 2009
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2009)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,550,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,050,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2008: ¥1,950,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥450,000)
Fiscal Year 2007: ¥1,950,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥450,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 外国語としての日本語教育 / 応用言語学 / 言語テスト / 口頭能力測定 / 評価法 / パフォーマンス評価 / 分析的評価 / 評価システム / パフォーマンス測定 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
The purpose of this study is to develop a web-based scoring system fbr Japanese Oral Proficiency Test. When the rater uses this system, he/she accesses the web-site which presents whole the test materials and controls whole the test process. Prior to the experiment, a pilot experiment was administered in 2008, the result of which applied to improve the system. The raters were instructed how to evaluate the level of four Japanese learners' speaking samples by the check list and the proficiency scale. Data was obtained from the 23 native Japanese teachers who had more than 3 years teaching experience. The results showed a relatively high validity for the raters' evaluation both in the check list and the proficiency scales. According to the raters' respond to our questionnaire, they seem to have felt relatively easy for operating this system. With some improvement, there should be good prospect for the practical implementation of the Follow-Up study.
|
