| Project/Area Number |
19530070
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Civil law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Kyoto University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
YAMADA Aya Kyoto University, 大学院・法学研究科, 教授 (40230445)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2008 – 2010
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2010)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,550,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,050,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2008: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2007: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 調停 / 法律事務 / 法的助言評価型調停 / 交渉促進型調停 / 証拠能力 / 職権探知 / ADR / 家事調停 / 民事調停 / ADR法 / 非訟手続 / 法化 / 証拠排除 / 法的助言 / 評価型調停 / confidentiality / 証言拒絶 / 守秘義務 / 仲裁 / 民事訴訟 / 消費者法 / 交渉 / 中立性 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
From the comparative studies, procedural rulings of ADR, depending on the characteristics of each legal sovereign and legal culture, can be classified into some areas ; such as continental law countries, England and US, Australia and Canada, southern east Asian countries, and east Asian countries. It is multiplex ruling, of hard law and soft law. The substantive aspects of ADR legalization should not be measured by the distance from the would-be-judgment. It should be analyzed with more detailed and complex framework, which shows the nature of the substantive law at stake, methods of providing legal information and advice, and the legal effect of compromised agreements. The Law for family conciliation has been amended during this study eriod and its influence on the legalization of general civil conciliation shall be studied from now on.
|
