Budget Amount *help |
¥4,420,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,020,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2008: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
Fiscal Year 2007: ¥1,950,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥450,000)
|
Research Abstract |
Both Japan and Korea experienced a dramatic increase in the proportion of non-regular workers in the 1990's. In the early 21^<st> century this trend has continued in Japan while in Korea, the government passed protective legislation in 2007 targeting non-regular workers and trying to mitigate growing job insecurity. This research examines the causes of the growth of non-regular employment in both countries using shift-share analysis and finds that the demand side factor explains most of the growth in non-regular employment in both countries since the 1990s. In response to heightened competition associated with globalization both countries adopted cost-cutting policies to remain competitive, especially in terms of reducing wage outlays. As a result, in both countries companies hired fewer regular workers and increased the proportion of temporary workers. Based upon the bread-winner model, both countries mandated social insurance benefits only for regular workers, creating a significant incentive to hire more temporary workers.
|