Project/Area Number |
19K20882
|
Project/Area Number (Other) |
18H05680 (2018)
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Research Activity Start-up
|
Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund (2019) Single-year Grants (2018) |
Review Section |
0107:Economics, business administration, and related fields
|
Research Institution | Kyoto University |
Principal Investigator |
|
Project Period (FY) |
2018-08-24 – 2020-03-31
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2019)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥1,690,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥390,000)
Fiscal Year 2019: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2018: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
|
Keywords | Evolution / Choice / Heterogeneity / Individual / Collective / Conventions / Risk attitudes / Choice rules / Behavior / Collaboration / Contagion / Preferences / Agency / Traits / evolution / choice / risk / heterogeneity / agency / Behavioral rules / Stochastic dynamics |
Outline of Research at the Start |
Agents follow choice rules, which determine how they act in specific situations. These choice rules can often be decomposed into two parts, a deterministic part and a stochastic part. I will prove results that relate economic contexts to the type of choice rules we can expect to observe.
|
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
Several papers were published that explore the boundary between collaborative choice and individualistic choice. These included "Watercooler chat, organizational structure and corporate culture" (Games & Economic Behavior), which explored the success and failure of different choice rules in the workplace, "Agency Equilibrium" (Games) which examined uncertain environments, "Collaboration leads to cooperation on sparse networks" (PLOS-Computational Biology) which examined cooperation, "Agency, potential and contagion" (Games & Economic Behavior) which related choice rules to potential functions. I further studied "Risk attitudes and risk dominance in the long run" (Games & Economic Behavior) and proved some important results on how choice rules can interact and be aggregated in populations ("Conventions under heterogeneous choice rules" - R&R at Review of Economic Studies). Further, I travelled extensively and pursued the project with the help of several international collaborators.
|
Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements |
I examined the relationship between how people make decisions individually and collectively and how it affects behavior in and out of the workplace. I further examined how societies can end up converging to common outcomes even if people behave very differently to one another.
|