• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to previous page

Detecting Concealed Information using the Medial Frontal Negativity

Research Project

Project/Area Number 19K23394
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Research Activity Start-up

Allocation TypeMulti-year Fund
Review Section 0110:Psychology and related fields
Research InstitutionKwansei Gakuin University

Principal Investigator

ORTHEY Robin  関西学院大学, 文学研究科, 博士研究員 (80844456)

Project Period (FY) 2019-08-30 – 2021-03-31
Project Status Completed (Fiscal Year 2020)
Budget Amount *help
¥2,340,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥540,000)
Fiscal Year 2020: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2019: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
KeywordsP300 / MFN / FRN / Malingering / Forced Choice Test / 2AFCT / ERP / Psychophysiology / FCT / CIT
Outline of Research at the Start

The purpose of this project is to evaluate the diagnostic validity of known ERP indices in the detection of feigned disability and crime knowledge. ERPs related to recognition (P300), deception (MFN), and feedback evaluation (fRN) are combined in the Forced Choice Test (FCT). The outcome of this project is an estimate of the diagnostic accuracy of the ERP based Forced Choice Test and further clarification on brain waves associated with deceptive responding and feedback evaluation.

Outline of Final Research Achievements

The Forced Choice Test (FCT) can be used as a clinical tool to detect fabricated cognitive symptoms, for example fake memory loss or deafness. However, it does not detect feigners who intentionally randomise their response pattern in this test. My objective was to find novel criteria sensitive to this behaviour in order to improve the overall diagnostic accuracy of the FCT. In this project, I examined the utility of the Medial Frontal Negativity (MFN), Feedback Related Negativity (FRN) and the P300 brain waves. The MFN is an indicator of response conflict, which could occur when malingerers make mistakes on purpose. The FRN and P300 occur when the examinee is presented with feedback on their performance, both could be reduced in malingerers. I demonstrate over two experiments that the MFN does not have diagnostic value in this context. However, the P300 and FRN can detect feigned performance and can be elicited in practice by including trial based feedback to the FCT.

Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements

A malingering test is used to detect fake psychological or cognitive symptoms. It is needed to ensure the credibility of psychological assessment. I demonstrate a way to improve the diagnostic accuracy of the Forced Choice Test by including trial based feedback and measuring the corresponding P300.

Report

(3 results)
  • 2020 Annual Research Report   Final Research Report ( PDF )
  • 2019 Research-status Report
  • Research Products

    (2 results)

All 2020

All Presentation (2 results) (of which Int'l Joint Research: 1 results,  Invited: 1 results)

  • [Presentation] How to detect crime amnesia in situations with limited information2020

    • Author(s)
      Robin Orthey
    • Organizer
      American Psychology and Law Society
    • Related Report
      2020 Annual Research Report
    • Int'l Joint Research
  • [Presentation] Are you really sorry you made a mistake?2020

    • Author(s)
      Robin Orthey
    • Organizer
      CAPS Symposium at Kwansei Gakuin University
    • Related Report
      2019 Research-status Report
    • Invited

URL: 

Published: 2019-09-03   Modified: 2022-01-27  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi