| Project/Area Number |
20320001
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Philosophy/Ethics
|
|---|
| Research Institution | The University of Tokyo |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
HIRONO Yoshiyuki The University of Tokyo, 大学院・総合文化研究科, 准教授 (90302819)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
MURATA Junichi 東京大学, 大学院・総合文化研究科, 教授 (40134407)
NOBUHARA Yukihiro 東京大学, 大学院・総合文化研究科, 教授 (10180770)
ISHIHARA Kohji 東京大学, 大学院・総合文化研究科, 准教授 (30291991)
KONO Tetsuya 立教大学, 文学部, 教授 (60384715)
HATTORI Hiroyuki 南山大学, 人文学部, 教授 (40110754)
YOKOYAMA Teruo 南山大学, 人文学部, 教授 (80148303)
SUZUKI Takayuki 南山大学, 人文学部, 准教授 (20434607)
HARA Saku 東北大学, 大学院・文学研究科, 准教授 (70463891)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
KAGAWA Chiaki 山梨大学, 医学工学総合研究部, 教授 (70224342)
TODAYAMA Kazuhisa 名古屋大学, 大学院・情報科学研究科, 教授 (90217513)
NAOE Kiyotaka 東北大学, 大学院・文学研究科, 准教授 (30312169)
SAKAGAMI Masamichi 玉川大学, 学術研究所, 教授 (10225782)
INABA Kazuto 中京大学, 法科大学院, 教授 (80309400)
NAKAYAMA Tsuyoshi 玉川大学, 文学部, 准教授 (00297095)
NAGAMINE Mitsue 防衛大学校, 人文社会科学群, 准教授 (80392455)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2008 – 2010
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2010)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥19,110,000 (Direct Cost: ¥14,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥4,410,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥6,500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥5,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,500,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥6,500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥5,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,500,000)
Fiscal Year 2008: ¥6,110,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,410,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 脳神経倫理 / 神経科学 / 脳神経科学 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
We investigated the document material concerning the neuroethics(one field of applied ethics being constructed as basic theory to control social, academic impact of neuroscience), and the results were announced by the research paper and oral. The symposia and the lecture meetings whose theme were the neuroethics, the neuroscience research and the adjacent areas, were held every year and the lively traffic in ideas was done to the grasp of the actual situation while discussing with the experts in each field.
|
