| Project/Area Number |
20330005
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Public law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Hokkaido University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
SASADA Eiji Hokkaido University, 大学院・法学研究科, 教授 (20205876)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
MURAKAMI Hiroaki 九州大学, 大学院・法学研究院, 教授 (20210015)
SUZUKI Hidemi 大阪大学, 大学院・高等司法研究科, 教授 (50247475)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
WATARI Tadasu 北海道大学, 大学院・法学研究院, 教授 (30125695)
AKASAKA Masahiro 神戸大学, 大学院・法学研究科, 教授 (80167816)
HAYASHI Tomonobu 東京大学, 社会科学研究所, 准教授 (30292816)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2008 – 2010
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2010)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥13,910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥10,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥3,210,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥3,640,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥840,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥5,330,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,230,000)
Fiscal Year 2008: ¥4,940,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,140,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 憲法 / 裁判の公開 / インカメラ審理 / 裁判を受ける権利 / 民事訴訟の基本原則 / 情報公開法 / 実効的権利保護 / メディア / 報道の自由 / 情報公開訴法 / 情報公開訴訟 / イン・カメラ手続 / 司法権 / 裁判 / 裁判員制度 / イン・カメラ / 法的聴聞権 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
The requirements for closing a public trial within the principle of a "public trial" are extremely strict. This research examined the reasons behind the legislative protection of privacy and corporate secrets in closing trials to the public. This research found that an examination into the theory behind the constitutionality of this issue required an interpretation that included a combination of the Kojogainen Kachosetsu, as well as an examination of articles 82 and 32 of the constitution from the perspective of the Reijisetsu. Furthermore, a proposal was given concerning a current legislative issue of in camera sessions in public information disclosure litigation. The proposal promotes legislation in the application and establishment of substantive requirements using the constitutional foundations that were found in this research.
|
