| Project/Area Number |
20330015
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Criminal law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Kyushu University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
DOL Masakazu 九州大学, 法学研究院, 教授 (30188841)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
KANAZAWA Mari 大阪市立大学, 大学院・法学研究科, 教授 (10302283)
SASAKI Mitsuaki 神戸学院大学, 法学部, 教授 (70300225)
MAEDA Tadahiro 甲南大学, 法学部, 教授 (60157138)
HIRAYAMA Mari 白鴎大学, 法学部, 准教授 (20406234)
FUCHINO Takao 立命館大学, 大学院・法務研究科, 教授 (20271851)
MASAKI Yuushi 静岡大学, 人文学部, 准教授 (70339597)
I NOUE Takahiro 九州大学, 大学院・法学研究院, 准教授 (70365005)
TAKEUCHI Kenji 九州大学, 大学院・法学研究院, 准教授 (10325540)
MORIHISA Chie 立命館大学, 法学部, 准教授 (40507969)
SAITO Tsukasa 龍谷大学, 法学部, 准教授 (20432784)
AMARI Kohji 国学院大学, 法学部, 准教授 (00456295)
CHOI Jonshoku 大阪商業大学, 総合経営学部, 准教授 (20380652)
MARUYAMA Yasuhir 立正大学, 法学部, 専任講師(特任) (60586189)
TAKAHIRA Kie 九州大学, 大学院・法学研究院, 助教 (30543160)
|
|---|
| Research Collaborator |
OOGAI Aoi 大阪市立大学, 大学院・法学研究科, 研究生
NOJIRI Kimimasa 一橋大学, 大学院・法学研究科, 後期博士課程)
AIZAWA Ikuo 九州大学, 大学院・法学府, 博士後期課程
YASUDA Megumi 大阪市立大学, 大学院・法学研究科, 博士後期課程
OHTSUKA Eriko 一橋大学, 大学院・法学研究科, 博士後期課程
FUJII Tsuyoshi 龍谷大学, 矯正・保護総合センター, 嘱託研究員
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2008 – 2010
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2010)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥17,940,000 (Direct Cost: ¥13,800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥4,140,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥5,330,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,230,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥6,110,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,410,000)
Fiscal Year 2008: ¥6,500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥5,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,500,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 非拘禁的措置 / 社会内処遇 / 社会内刑罰 / 電子監視 / 社会貢献活動 / 刑の一部執行猶予 / 更生保護施設 / 社会奉仕命令 / 社会的援助 / 保護観察 / ネットワイドニング |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
Non-custodial measures recently contain not only a community treatment that means traditional rehabilitation or probation but also community punishment or measures that are used as an alternative imprisonment. The community treatment or probation is often combined with the electric monitoring or the social service order and it becomes to a kind of punishments. Therefore the probation lose the element of social case work and is changed to a way of surveillance from support of criminals. Some countries place the electric monitoring or social service order as a sort of punishments in the non-custodial measures.
On the other hand, there is an approach that will divert the disabled or aged persons who are exclusive from the welfare-netting and commit crimes repeatedly from the criminal proceedings before imprisonment, and will place the measures that join those people to the social welfare system in the non-custodial measures.
This research analyzed those two approaches from the point of view of the social inclusion and the protection of fundamental human rights of accused persons and prisoners. We pointed out that the electric monitoring or the social service order should not be introduced as a sort of punishments or a severe sanction combined with social treatments and not be also placed as noncustodial measures. Noncustodial measures should be free from the elements of punishment as much as possible and be connected to the social welfare. We call it the criminal proceedings connected to the social welfare.
On this point of view we analyzed critically the bill on the suspended sentence of a part of custodial sentence that can cause a tough policy and a preventive detention.
|
