The English Methodenstreit in the end of the 19th century
| Project/Area Number |
20530166
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Economic doctrine/Economic thought
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Hokkaido University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
SASAKI Kensuke Hokkaido University, 大学院・経済学研究科, 教授 (50178646)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2008 – 2010
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2010)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥2,210,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥510,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2008: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | イギリス歴史学派 / 方法論争 / J.S.ミル / 帰納法 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
The crucial issue of the English Methodenstreit (methodological controversy) was whether economists should study given facts or idealized models. The former approach was called inductive method and the latter deductive method. The approach of historical school advanced from the investigation of historical laws to the explanation of individual historical facts. The controversy was due to the difference of aptitude and interest between the two camps.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(8 results)
