| Project/Area Number |
20560518
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Building structures/materials
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Kyoto University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
KAMAE Katsuhiro Kyoto University, 原子炉実験所, 教授 (50161196)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
KAWABE Hidenori 京都大学, 原子炉実験所, 助教 (00346066)
UEBAYASHI Hirotoshi 京都大学, 原子炉実験所, 准教授 (30300312)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2008 – 2010
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2010)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,640,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥840,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2008: ¥1,820,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥420,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 地震防災 / 原子力 / 耐震設計 / 基準地震動 / 内陸地殻内地震 / 震源モデル / 経験的グリーン関数法 / 2009年駿河湾の地震 / スケーリング則 / 微動探査 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
The evaluation approach of the design basis earthquake ground motion demanded in a new regulation for the seismic design of the nuclear plant was examined. First of all, the focus was applied to modeling the source process through the reproduction of the record at the Kashiwazaki and Kariwa nuclear power plant of Tokyo Electric Power Company during the 2007 Niigata-ken Chuetsu-oki Earthquake (Mj6.8), and the analytical examination was executed. As a result, it was able to propose the source model consisting of three asperities, and to point out the importance of the evaluation of the propagation path-effect of the seismic motion from source to site. Moreover, during the earthquake occurred beneath the Suruga bay in March, 2009, a peculiar record (the characteristics of the observed ground motion is remarkably different according to the unit) was obtained in the Hamaoka nuclear power plant of the Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc. The source model was first constructed, and the existence of the asperity that had a little high amount of the stress parameter as the slab earthquake was pointed out. To our regret, we could not clarify the cause of the different observed ground motions between the units from the microtremor measurement on and around the site.
|
