How citizen judges evaluate the reliability of eyewitnesses?
| Project/Area Number |
20730469
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Research Field |
Experimental psychology
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Nagoya University (2010-2011)
Hokkaido University (2008-2009) |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2008 – 2011
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2011)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,160,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥960,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2008: ¥1,820,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥420,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 目撃証言 / 裁判員制度 / 素朴理論 / 模擬裁判 / 判例分析 / 目撃記憶 / 信頼性 / 子ども / 信頼性評価 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
It was examined how judges/prospective lay judges assess the reliability of eyewitness identification. Mock trial experiments and text-mining of judicial precedents were conducted. Results showed that information relevant to the reliability doesn' t necessarily impact independently in assessing the reliability of eyewitness identification. The impacts of information might be modified by impacts of other information interactively.
|
Report
(6 results)
Research Products
(16 results)
