State, Right and Procedure in the Research of Legal History in Japan and Germany: A Comparative Study
Project/Area Number |
21530003
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Fundamental law
|
Research Institution | The University of Tokyo |
Principal Investigator |
NISHIKAWA Yoichi 東京大学, 大学院・法学政治学研究科, 教授 (00114596)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2009 – 2012
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2012)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥3,250,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥750,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥390,000 (Direct Cost: ¥300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥90,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
|
Keywords | 法制史 / 国制史 / 中世国家 / ゲルマン的連続性 / 封建制 / 法実証主義 |
Research Abstract |
Classical constitutional history in Germany was led by an idealism which emphasized the reconstruction according to the ideals and by the reason of the historian not only in the historical reconstruction but also in the text-critique. The image of a continuous inner order of a political body maintained by the new generation of constitutional historians after the First World War who criticized the “anachronistic historical concepts” of the classical constitutional history was often built upon premises without historical foundations. The classical Japanese legal history seldom questioned the ultimate principle of the integration of a political body and strove rather consciously to construct a modern private law order.
|
Report
(5 results)
Research Products
(11 results)