On the Validity of Jellinek's and Weber's Views on the Origin of Human Rights : A Study from the Viewpoint of History of Law and Legal Thought
Project/Area Number |
21530010
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Fundamental law
|
Research Institution | Nara University of Education |
Principal Investigator |
SANO Makoto 奈良教育大学, 教育学部, 教授 (90202100)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2009 – 2011
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2011)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥3,120,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥720,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥1,820,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥420,000)
|
Keywords | 人権の起源 / 信教の自由 / 権利の章典 / イェリネク / ヴェーバー / ヴァージニアの権利の章典 / イギリスの北アメリカ植民地 / ゲオルク・イェリネック / マックス・ヴェーバー / ロジャー・ウィリアムズ / 「アメリカ合衆国憲法」修正第1条 / アメリカ諸州の権利章典 / アメリカ合衆国憲法修正第1条 / フランスの人権宣言 / エルンスト・トレルチ / 教会とゼクテ |
Research Abstract |
The purpose of this study is to historically verify whether a theory that the origin of human rights is to be found in freedom of religion can be recognized as appropriate. As a result, especially the following four points became clear. The first is that freedom of religion could not be regarded as the conclusive origin of human rights. The second is that in the process of codifying the Virginia Bill of Rights that has been regarded as the document of the oldest rights of man, the section of freedom of religion could not come to a definitive conclusion to the end. The third is that the addressee of freedom of religion was not all the people, but Protestants. The fourth is that regarding the origin of human rights in America, not only freedom of religion but also the right of the people to keep and bear arms was an important factor.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(23 results)