A Fundamental Research of a History of Philosophy Concerning the Rise of the British New Realism
| Project/Area Number |
22520001
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Philosophy/Ethics
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Hokkaido University of Education |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2010-04-01 – 2015-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2014)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥260,000 (Direct Cost: ¥200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥60,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥260,000 (Direct Cost: ¥200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥60,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥260,000 (Direct Cost: ¥200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥60,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥260,000 (Direct Cost: ¥200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥60,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥260,000 (Direct Cost: ¥200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥60,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 新実在論 / 判断論 / 記述理論 / ムーア / ラッセル / 記述の理論 / 英国新実在論 / ブレンターノ |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
We examined, focusing on G. E. Moore's theory of judgment, what made up the British New Realism in the 20th century. Moore criticized Kant for his inconsequence to the effect that a dogma of empiricism had blocked Kant's Transcendentalism. In order to realize Kant's project, Moore advocated his new theory of judgment which ascribes truth to the combination of non-temporal concepts.
We showed that Moore consequently had a bizarre opinion about contingent propositions and fell in a predicament, which Bertrand Russell's theory of descriptions could resolve, distinguishing constituents of a proposition from the things which the proposition is a propositon about.
|
Report
(6 results)
Research Products
(6 results)
