| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,550,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,050,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
|
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
The issues subject to exclusive jurisdiction are determined in accordance with criterion whether or not interference to them by foreign states should be rejected in terms state vs. state context, whereas the issues subject to non-arbitrability are determined in accordance with criterion whether or not they are left to disposal by people in terms of state vs. people context. The former issues, therefore, should be what are deeply involved with the dignity of state, lost of which would impair sovereignty itself; the latter issues should be what people may not be settled by amicable composition.
Proceedings which have as their object rights in rem in immovable property in Japan, which are not listed in Article 3-5 of Code of Civil Procedure, should be subject to exclusive jurisdiction of Japanese courts.
|
