A Study of Differences between Ricardo Studies in Japan and in the West
Project/Area Number |
22530193
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Economic doctrine/Economic thought
|
Research Institution | Hirosaki University |
Principal Investigator |
|
Project Period (FY) |
2010-04-01 – 2015-03-31
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2014)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥3,510,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥810,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
|
Keywords | 古典派経済学 / リカード / スラッファ / 経済学史 / リカード研究 |
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
In this study, I examined and compared Ricardo studies in Japan with those in the West since the publication of <Ricardo Works> (1951-73) edited by Piero Sraffa. As a result, I found that Western scholars had continued supporting Sraffa's interpretation of Ricardo in accordance with their belief in the importance of theoretical contributions and modern significance. I also made clear that, although they had received considerable influences from Sraffa, Japanese scholars, who valued historical facts and inherent viewpoints more, had criticised Sraffa's interpretation of Ricardo. In addition, I emphasised that Japanese scholars had brought about original and outstanding studies of Ricardo, mainly on the study of development process of his labour theory of value.
|
Report
(6 results)
Research Products
(19 results)