Research on the advocacy work and its function of NPOs in the field of welfare: from a comparative perspective
Project/Area Number |
22530536
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Sociology
|
Research Institution | Kanazawa University |
Principal Investigator |
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
TANABE Hiroshi 金沢大学, 人間科学系, 准教授 (50293329)
OKUDA Mutsuko 金沢大学, 経済学経営学, 准教授 (90320895)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2010 – 2012
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2012)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥4,290,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥990,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥1,820,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥420,000)
|
Keywords | アドボカシー / NPO / 福祉レジーム論 / 北欧 / 社会民主主義型 / アメリカ / 自由主義型 / 福祉 / 福祉国家 / 比較 / フィンランド / ドイツ |
Research Abstract |
In this research, we reviewed the advocacy work and its function of NPOs in the field of welfare , in reference to Esping-Andersen’s welfare regime typology. We found that NPOs are actively participating in policymaking both in the Scandinavian countries and in the United States. However, we also found that there is a difference in the cooperative relationship with the government between these two kinds of sectors: In Scandinavian nations, welfare policymaking is done under the strong support from the governments, and thus, it is always done smoothly. In the United States, on the other hand, it is often done on a tense relationship with the federal or state governments, and because of this, there are cases in which its efficiency is barred. We claim that this difference is attributed to the fact that the former sector is classified into the social democratic regime, whereas the latter into the liberal regime.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(45 results)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
[Book] 地域創造学テキスト, (田邊浩,地域創造学と現代社会,1~11 ,社会的排除と包括,43~44ページ,高橋涼子,家族.31~32,奥田睦子,ノーマライゼーション,87~88)2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-