| Project/Area Number |
22592502
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Lifelong developmental nursing
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Mie Prefectural College of Nursing |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
NIMURA Ryoko 三重県立看護大学, 看護学部看護学科, 准教授 (30249354)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
NAGAMI Keiko 三重県立看護大学, 看護学部・看護学科, 教授 (10218026)
SAKIYAMA Takayo 前三重県立看護大学, 看護学部・看護学科, 講師 (40321278)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
MURAMOTO Junko 三重県立看護大学, 看護学部・看護学科, 学長 (50239547)
WACHI Shigemi 三重県立看護大学, 看護学部・看護学科, 講師 (70410173)
NAKAYAMA Yuko 元三重県立看護大学, 看護学部・看護学科, 助教 (20433229)
TANAKA Rie 前三重県立看護大学, 看護学部・看護学科, 助教 (90515793)
IWATA Tomomi 三重県立看護大学, 看護学部・看護学科, 助手 (20609292)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2010 – 2012
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2012)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,680,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,080,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥3,250,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥750,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 助産師 / OSCE(客観的臨床能力試験) / 臨床能力 / 分娩介助技術 / OSCE（客観的臨床能力試験） / 助産師教育課程 / OSCE / 助産教育課程 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
We created four Objective Structured Clinical Examination(OSCE) related to the stages from pregnancy to the postpartum and neonatal periods, implemented them on midwives with varying degrees of clinical experience, and investigated their effectiveness. Based both on analysis of recorded contents and on the contents of interviews conducted after the OSCE, the OSCE were found to be effective for assessing skill acquisition among midwives, regardless of difference in clinical experience. These findings suggest the need both to clarify the assessment process for which differences were observed by clinical experience, and to make modifications in order to set issues such as future predictions and clarification of the activity levels of subjects as assessment perspectives.
|
