| Project/Area Number |
23243009
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
International law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Doshisha University (2013-2015)
Kobe University (2011-2012) |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
IGARASHI Masahiro 神戸大学, 国際協力研究科, 教授 (70168102)
SHIBATA Akiho 神戸大学, 国際協力研究科, 教授 (00273954)
HAYASHI Mika 神戸大学, 国際協力研究科, 教授 (60362810)
TAMADA Dai 神戸大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (60362563)
KOTERA Akira 東京大学, 総合文化研究科, 教授 (80107490)
ASADA Masahiko 京都大学, 公共政策研究科, 教授 (90192939)
SAKAI Hironobu 京都大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (80252807)
KUROKAMI Naozumi 岡山大学, 社会文化科学研究科, 教授 (80294396)
KOBAYASHI Tomohiko 小樽商科大学, 商学部, 准教授 (20378508)
MAEDA Naoko 京都女子大学, 法学部, 講師 (80353514)
新井 京 同志社大学, 法学部, 教授 (10319436)
川岸 伸 神戸大学, 国際協力研究科, 助教 (30612379)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
ABE Tatsuya 青山学院大学, 国際政治経済学部, 教授 (80511972)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2011-04-01 – 2016-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2015)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥35,750,000 (Direct Cost: ¥27,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥8,250,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥3,900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥900,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥6,890,000 (Direct Cost: ¥5,300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,590,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥7,800,000 (Direct Cost: ¥6,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,800,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥8,190,000 (Direct Cost: ¥6,300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,890,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥8,970,000 (Direct Cost: ¥6,900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥2,070,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 国際法 / 訴訟化 / 国際裁判 / 国際司法裁判所 / 捕鯨事件 / 国際海洋法裁判所 / 国際投資仲裁 / 裁判化 / 司法化 / 国際公法 / WTO / 国際刑事裁判所 / 国際人権裁判所 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
In terms of "juridictionalisation" of international law, this research focused on the international courts and tribunals, which are now expanding in international society in its number and quality. As a result, the following points have been clarified; (1) realisation of international law through litigation, (2) evolutive interpretation of treaties in litigation, (3) dispute settlement and realisation of interests by litigation, (4) creation of case law by a lot of cases and the expansion of foreseeability of law. Furthermore, by analysing the Whaling case between Australia and Japan, it has been clarified that the litigation theory is needed to be combined with the litigation strategy and diplomatic policy.
|
