| Project/Area Number |
23300263
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
General human life sciences
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Hosei University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
KINOE Yosuke 法政大学, 国際文化学部, 教授 (70343613)
|
|---|
| Research Collaborator |
Sjölinder Marie Swedish Institute of Computer Science, シニアリサーチャー
UCHITOMI Ayako 法政大学, 大学院国際文化研究科
NOGUCHI Asuka 法政大学, 大学院国際文化研究科
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2011-04-01 – 2016-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2015)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥9,100,000 (Direct Cost: ¥7,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥2,100,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥2,730,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥630,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥3,510,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥810,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | コミュニケーション支援 / 離れて暮らす家族 / フィールド調査 / 質的研究 / 非言語コミュニケーション / 多感覚情報通信 / 家族生活史 / クオリティ・オブ・ライフ / 人間の空間行動特性 / フィールド調査・実験 / QoL / 生活世界 / ＱｏＬ / 介護生活支援 / 家族研究 / 国際情報交換 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
This study presented an integrated approach that combined a qualitative study and development of a new communication supporting environment for geographically distributed family members. Our process consisted of field interviews, qualitative analysis, establishment of design principles, and development of peripheral communication prototypes.
We conducted a series of in-depth semi-structured interviews with various families of the different types of household structures, who lived alone, lived apart or lived together. They included elderly persons, visually impaired persons, long-hospitalized children, and their family members. On the basis of the analysis results, we established a set of design principles and developed different types of peripheral communication. We also conducted field evaluation sessions. Positive responses were obtained for a prototype employing tangible communication, and a prototype based on a specific family episode.
|
