Project/Area Number |
23401006
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Section | 海外学術 |
Research Field |
Geography
|
Research Institution | Keiai University |
Principal Investigator |
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
KOMAI Takeshi 東北大学, 大学院環境科学研究科, 教授 (30357024)
MATSUO Hiroshi 敬愛大学, 国際学部国際学科, 講師 (60637081)
MATSUMOTO Futoshi 敬愛大学, 国際学部国際学科, 講師 (00449323)
OOKA Kenzo 敬愛大学, 総合地域研究所, 客員研究員 (20711873)
YACHI Takashi 敬愛大学, 総合地域研究所, 客員研究員 (70598044)
濱田 浩美 千葉大学, 教育学部, 教授 (60292653)
戸田 真夏 お茶の水女子大学, 学内共同利用施設等, 研究員 (80267393)
谷口 智雅 三重大学, 人文学部, その他 (70449320)
|
Research Collaborator |
NARISAWA Noboru
NISHIDA Shigehiro
Maharjan Dr. Makhan
Bhanu Bhakta kandel
Shrestha Rosan
Ghimire Hari Prasad
Gam Prasad Gurung
|
Project Period (FY) |
2011-04-01 – 2016-03-31
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2015)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥18,460,000 (Direct Cost: ¥14,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥4,260,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥3,770,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥870,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥3,770,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥870,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥4,030,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥930,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥6,240,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,440,000)
|
Keywords | ヒ素汚染 / ネパール / テライ低地 / ナワルパラシ / 地下水 / 井戸水利用 / ボーリング調査 / 井戸 / 生活用水 / 水質 / 地質 / 雨水利用 / 井戸水 |
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
We have been conducting the arsenic investigation in the rectangle area, about 6km east-west and about 10km north-south, in Parasi, Nawalparasi county in the Terai lowland, Nepal. While grasping the arsenic contamination horizontally and vertically in the surveyed area by the underground drilling survey, groundwater quality testing and by water level monitoring, we investigated the causes of the contamination hydrologically and geologically. On the local inhabitants drinking the arsenic-contaminated groundwater, we interviewed them utilizing questionnaire survey and analyzed the results in order to make clear of their attitude towards the water and the actual usage of the drinking wells, and we suggested establishing appropriate measures to get the arsenic-free, safest drinking water.
|