| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,810,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,110,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥1,690,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥390,000)
|
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
From the viewpoint of defending atemi-waza, present author obtained the following interpretations by comparing the investigation of Sumiyuki Kotani & Tadao Otaki’s explanation of “mizunagare” and “Kodaore” in the“Koshiki-no-kata", the first kata of the“Itsutsu-no-kata” and Kenji Tomiki’s instruction about the same techniques. (1) The practicality in judo that Kano pursued exists in the method of “pulling Uke’s wrist upwards” in the Mizunagare. (2) The jujutsu type of atemi-waza is founded upon balance breaking by tori’s touching uke and consequtive pushing of uke in the Kodaore. (3) The same type of atemi-waza as the Kodaore also exists in the first kata of the“Itsutsu-no-kata”. (4) Karate-style of atemi-waza that is seen in “Seiryoku-zenyo-kokumin-taiiku” seems to have a different fundamental structure from the atemi-waza of jujutsu.
Thus, it is considered that there is the feasibility of method of free practice in judo that included atemi-waza.
|
