| Project/Area Number |
23520753
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Foreign language education
|
|---|
| Research Institution | The University of Aizu |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
EMIKO Kaneko (30533624)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2011 – 2013
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2013)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥2,340,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥540,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | oral presentation / English for engineering / non-native-speaker / Non-native speaker / 国際情報交流 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
First, body orientation of speaker to audience and the average rate of slide text to spoken words not appearing on slides, which we termed the XTRAN score, were measured at international conferences of engineering research. Two conferences were measured in Europe and two in Asia. The majority of presenters were non-native speakers of English (NNSEs). We took the most extreme examples of the four conferences and averaged them to obtain objective markers for two styles of presentation: Mode A with body facing audience and high XTRAN score, and Mode B with body sideways to audience and low XTRAN score (few words spoken that are not on the slides). We tested these two modes on audiences of computer science graduate students, all NNSEs, using a NNSE computer science researcher who used an actual presentation he had previously given at an international conference. We found no difference in comprehension rates, although audiences slightly preferred the Mode A to Mode B in terms of enjoyment.
|
