• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to previous page

A empirically research of quash the judgment as Article 325 (2) Code of Civil Procedure

Research Project

Project/Area Number 23530114
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)

Allocation TypeMulti-year Fund
Section一般
Research Field Civil law
Research InstitutionKyoto Sangyo University

Principal Investigator

KUSAKA Shinichi  京都産業大学, 法務研究科, 教授 (30327118)

Project Period (FY) 2011 – 2013
Project Status Completed (Fiscal Year 2013)
Budget Amount *help
¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥130,000 (Direct Cost: ¥100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥30,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥390,000 (Direct Cost: ¥300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥90,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Keywords民事訴訟法 / 民事上告審 / 破棄判決 / 民事執行法 / 仮執行宣言
Research Abstract

Japanese Code of civil procedure say, The Supreme Court, as the final appellate court, even where the grounds prescribed in Article 312, paragraph (1) or (2) do not exist, may quash the judgment in prior instance if there is a violation of laws or regulations that apparently affects a judgment, and except in the cases set forth in the following Article, may remand the case to the court of prior instance or transfer the case to another court equivalent thereto (Article 325 (2)). How often and how to use The Supreme Court of Japan this authority? I analyzed it with two Japanese Judgment databases, LEX/DB and LLI. A specially point is a change after the total amendment of Code of civil procedure, 1996. Finally find I no change between before and after amendment. It is first analyze in this point.

Report

(4 results)
  • 2013 Annual Research Report   Final Research Report ( PDF )
  • 2012 Research-status Report
  • 2011 Research-status Report
  • Research Products

    (8 results)

All 2014 2012 2011 Other

All Journal Article (3 results) (of which Peer Reviewed: 1 results) Presentation (4 results) Remarks (1 results)

  • [Journal Article] 即時抗告の相手方に攻撃防御の機会を与えることなく申立てを却下した抗告裁判所の審理手続に違法があるとされた事例2012

    • Author(s)
      草鹿晋一
    • Journal Title

      法学セミナー増刊速報判例解説, 日本評論社

      Volume: vol.10新 Pages: 27-130

    • Related Report
      2013 Final Research Report
  • [Journal Article] 民事上告審における職権破棄の裁量性について2011

    • Author(s)
      草鹿晋一
    • Journal Title

      産大法学

      Volume: 44巻4号 Pages: 25-47

    • NAID

      110008004500

    • Related Report
      2013 Final Research Report
  • [Journal Article] 速報判例解説民事訴訟法 No.342011

    • Author(s)
      草鹿晋一
    • Journal Title

      TKC ローライブラリー

      Volume: 0 Pages: 1-4

    • Related Report
      2011 Research-status Report
    • Peer Reviewed
  • [Presentation] 最高裁判所への上告理由と職権破棄~平成26年1月28日最高裁(三)判決平成23年(行ヒ)332号を読む~2014

    • Author(s)
      草鹿晋一
    • Organizer
      北陸公法判例研究会
    • Place of Presentation
      石川四高記念文化交流館, (口頭発表)
    • Year and Date
      2014-03-15
    • Related Report
      2013 Final Research Report
  • [Presentation] 仮執行宣言に基づく債務の履行とその効力ー最高裁平成24年4月6日判決を契機としてー2012

    • Author(s)
      草鹿晋一
    • Organizer
      関西民事訴訟法研究会
    • Place of Presentation
      エルおおさか, (口頭発表)
    • Year and Date
      2012-09-29
    • Related Report
      2013 Final Research Report
  • [Presentation] 最高裁判所への上告理由と職権破棄 ~平成26年1月28日最高裁(三)判決(平成23年(行ヒ)332号)を読む~

    • Author(s)
      草鹿晋一
    • Organizer
      北陸公法判例研究会
    • Place of Presentation
      石川四高記念文化交流館
    • Related Report
      2013 Annual Research Report
  • [Presentation] 仮執行宣言に基づく債務の履行とその効力 ー最高裁平成24年4月6日判決を契機としてー

    • Author(s)
      草鹿晋一
    • Organizer
      関西民事訴訟法研究会
    • Place of Presentation
      エル・オオサカ
    • Related Report
      2012 Research-status Report
  • [Remarks] 1.草鹿晋一「速報判例解説◆民事訴訟法No.34 」文献番号 z18817009-00-060340718(TKC ローライブラリー,2011)

    • Related Report
      2013 Final Research Report

URL: 

Published: 2011-08-05   Modified: 2019-07-29  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi