An Empirical Study of Judge Advocate(Homukan) in Prewar Japan
Project/Area Number |
23530168
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Politics
|
Research Institution | Meiji University |
Principal Investigator |
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
KOMORI Yuta 明治大学, 研究・知財戦略機構, 研究員 (70584423)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2011 – 2013
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2013)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥5,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,200,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥1,950,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥450,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥2,470,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥570,000)
|
Keywords | 軍法務官 / 非法曹の司法参加 / 軍法会議 / 司法官僚 / 経歴的資源 / 政軍関係 / 最高裁事務総局 / 司法行政 / 司法の独立 |
Research Abstract |
This research focuses on Judge Advocate (Homukan) in Prewar Japan. The court-martial consisted of five judges in Prewar Japan. Four of them were officers and one was a civilian called Judge Advocate (Homukan). Judge Advocate was therefore the only attorney on the court-martial. This research was an empirical study of Judge Advocate. We investigated their name, their working conditions, their role on the court-martial, and so on. Judge Advocate had been tenured since 1922. This meant that Judge Advocate could exercise independent powers on the court-martial. But this privilege was abolished after the outbreak of the Pacific War. Judge Advocate had no choice but to abide by the request of Supreme Command (Tosuiken). In addition, Judge Advocate was to rank as an officer. This research also approached the details.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(44 results)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
[Presentation] 司法行政からみた裁判官2013
Author(s)
西川伸一
Organizer
八ッ場ダムをストップさせる東京の会
Place of Presentation
豊島区生活産業プラザ
Year and Date
2013-06-01
Related Report
Invited
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-