| Project/Area Number |
23530795
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Social welfare and social work studies
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Kanagawa University of Human Services (2012-2013)
Tezukayama University (2011) |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
YAMAMOTO Keiko 神奈川県立保健福祉大学, 保健福祉学部, 教授 (20309503)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
IOKA Tsutomu 同志社大学, 名誉教授 (80066240)
YAGIHASHI Keiichi 神戸医療福祉大学, 社会福祉学部, 講師 (70570349)
IWAMITSU Kenji 愛知教育大学, 教育学部, 講師 (00454893)
OHMURA Kazumasa 立命館大学, 産業社会学部, 非常勤講師 (30571393)
SHOUNO Yoshiyuki 京都女子大学, 家政学部, 助教 (90514167)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2011 – 2013
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2013)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥5,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,200,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥2,210,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥510,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥1,690,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥390,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 貧困 / 社会的排除 / 差別 / 英国 / 社会的企業 / ホームレス |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
Pertaining to social inclusion for the homeless in the British urban areas, we conducted a survey of the evaluation framework which can grasp the outcome. As for the effectiveness of Social Return on Investment, it is open to a question. In our research, data and system of monitoring tend to be lacking, and being complicated in workout. For these reasons, there is a tendency to request evaluation work from external specialists. On the other hand, local social enterprises tend to adopt the qualitative method. Being this case, we examined Outcome Star, a qualitative evaluation. In the final analysis, there is a limitation to display the outcome by a monetary value, and it holds good to evaluate from viewpoints, such as social relationship, social capital, local economy and environment. In a nutshell, an attempt to combine quantitative and qualitative appraisal focused on an individual organization come out more effective.
|
