International Comparative Research on University Governance Reform: Exploring the Role of Organisational Culture and Staff Development
| Project/Area Number |
23531062
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Educaion
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Hiroshima University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
OBA Jun 広島大学, 高等教育研究開発センター, 准教授 (50335692)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
ASHIZAWA Shingo 東洋大学, 国際地域学部, 教授 (00359853)
ONUKI Yukiko 大阪大学, 未来戦略機構戦略企画室, 特任講師 (30553416)
TANAKA Gaku 九州大学, 基幹教育院教育企画開発部, 准教授 (80553411)
|
|---|
| Research Collaborator |
MAEDA Kazuyuki 広島大学, 大学院教育学研究科, 博士課程後期(京都教育大学職員)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2011 – 2013
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2013)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥5,070,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,170,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥2,080,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥480,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 大学ガバナンス / 組織文化 / 意思決定 / 職員開発 / リーダーシップ / 大学経営 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
In the course of recent university reforms in Japan, explicit elements of the institutional governance, such as organisational structures and distribution of responsibilities (particularly in favour of top-down decision-making), have been emphasised by the government, thus leading all the universities more or less towards the same direction in terms of governance arrangements. This research, however, has revealed that, through a questionnaire survey and international comparison, university governance is very diverse and that there is no single form that may be generally used across institutions. This fact implies that governance-related policy should not be across-the-board for all the universities but that it should rather assist each university in effectively devising its own governance arrangements with a particular focus on implicit elements such as active participation of constituencies, trust among them, consensus building and supportive leadership across the institution.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(36 results)
