Evaluation of anatomical liver function in hepatectomy using SPECT/CT fused imaging
Project/Area Number |
23591779
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Radiation science
|
Research Institution | Kumamoto University |
Principal Investigator |
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
SHIRAISHI Shinya 熊本大学, 生命科学研究部, 助教 (50433008)
YOSHIDA Morikatsu 熊本大学, 医学部附属病院, 特任助教 (20508494)
KAWANAKA Koichi 熊本大学, 生命科学研究部, 助教 (60398188)
SAKAMOTO Fumi 熊本大学, 医学部附属病院, 医員 (10551252)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2011 – 2013
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2013)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥5,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,200,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥2,340,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥540,000)
|
Keywords | 画像診断学 / 生体肝移植 / 肝予備能評価 / アシアロシンチグラフィー / マルチスライスCT / SPECT / SPECT/CT / 肝切除 / GSA / マルチスライスCT |
Research Abstract |
We proposed Liver Uptake Value (LUV) and Functional Liver Index (FLI) as quantitative indices for evaluating the regional function of liver. LUV and FLI correlated with the degree of hepatic fibrosis. The LUV of future remnant liver obtained before hepatectomy was related with the postoperative hepatic functional reserve. Moreover, we suggested that surgery can be performed safely in patients whose LUV(BSA) of the liver remnant is above 27.0.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(34 results)
-
-
[Journal Article] Added value of high-b-value (b = 3000 s/mm2) diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T in relation to fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images for the evaluation of cortical lesions in inflammatory brain diseases.2013
Author(s)
Iwashita K, Hirai T, Kitajima M, Shigematsu Y, Uetani H, Iryo Y, Azuma M, Hayashida E, Ando Y, Murakami R, Yamashita Y.
-
Journal Title
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Volume: 37
Pages: 338-342
Related Report
Peer Reviewed
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-