• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to previous page

Restructuring patent prosecution process as a tool of implementing competition policy-from a fundamental point of view

Research Project

Project/Area Number 23653030
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research

Allocation TypeMulti-year Fund
Research Field New fields of law
Research InstitutionUniversity of Tsukuba

Principal Investigator

HIRASHIMA Ryuta  筑波大学, ビジネスサイエンス系, 教授 (70302792)

Project Period (FY) 2011 – 2012
Project Status Completed (Fiscal Year 2012)
Budget Amount *help
¥2,080,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥480,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Keywords特許権 / 特許出願プロセス / 競争政策 / イノヴェーション / 市場への影響 / 行政行為 / 差止請求権 / 権利の排他性 / 出願審査 / 実施行為 / 市場競争
Research Abstract

The main purpose of this research project is to get some insight about if we could reconstruct patent prosecution process (which consists of patent application, examination, objection and board trial), almost conducted by Patent & Trademark Office (PTO),as a useful tool of implementing best competition policy. The summary of conclusion is below; 1) the answer to “Is it theoretically possible for PTO to estimate the effect of patent-applied invention from the point of competition policy? ” would be positive, that means, mostly, “Yes”. Though, to estimate competitive effect in the market of applied inventions in patent prosecution process, we should make new enactment about that and could not suffer from huge administrative cost to implement the system in PTO.2) the answer to ”Could the ”exclusivity” of patent right be theoretically adjusted by limiting the scope of activities protecting patented invention under the “patent right”(such as “make “,”use”, ”sell”, etc)?” is not definitive yet.To vary the scope of exclusion by the patent right from respective inventions would be an epoch-making idea as some scholarship in U.S. suggest, though, this research has made clear that much problems to be solved would be accompanied at the same time. 3) the answer to question 3)”If we could introduce above two hypothetical “ideas” into patent prosecution process, how effects could we expect?” is; today, technological innovation going on so fast, it seems very difficult for the PTO to currently estimate precisely the effect of patent-applied invention from the point of competition policy, so, there need tobe much study to implement the idea of estimating the market effect from the point of competition policy, particularly, much study about balancing between cost and benefit to institute the above idea.

Report

(3 results)
  • 2012 Annual Research Report   Final Research Report ( PDF )
  • 2011 Research-status Report
  • Research Products

    (4 results)

All 2012

All Journal Article (2 results) (of which Peer Reviewed: 1 results) Book (2 results)

  • [Journal Article] 技術標準に必須な特許権の行使における差止請求権の制限可能性-理論的帰結と実務的課題への対応可能性2012

    • Author(s)
      平嶋竜太
    • Journal Title

      知財研フォーラム

      Volume: 90 Pages: 27-37

    • Related Report
      2012 Final Research Report
    • Peer Reviewed
  • [Journal Article] 技術標準に必須な特許権の行使における差止請求権の制限可能性-理論的帰結と実務的課題への対応可能性2012

    • Author(s)
      平嶋竜太
    • Journal Title

      知財研フォーラム

      Volume: 90 Pages: 27-37

    • Related Report
      2012 Annual Research Report
  • [Book] 知的財産法の理論的探究2012

    • Author(s)
      平嶋竜太
    • Total Pages
      462
    • Publisher
      日本評論社
    • Related Report
      2012 Final Research Report
  • [Book] 知的財産法の理論的探究(高林龍・三村量一・竹中俊子編・現代知的財産法講座I)133-163頁2012

    • Author(s)
      平嶋竜太
    • Total Pages
      462
    • Publisher
      日本評論社
    • Related Report
      2012 Annual Research Report

URL: 

Published: 2011-08-05   Modified: 2019-07-29  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi