| Project/Area Number |
23730512
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Research Field |
Sociology
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Kwansei Gakuin University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
TATEISHI Yuji 関西学院大学, 社会学部, 准教授 (00546765)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2011 – 2013
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2013)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥1,950,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥450,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 環境社会学 / 科学社会学 / 科学技術社会論 / 地球温暖化問題 / エネルギー問題 / テクノクラシー / ライフサイクルアセスメント（LCA） / 古紙リサイクル / 社会学 / 科学技術社会学 / 費用便益分析 / エネルギー / 市民参加 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
This study examined the technocratic structure of environmental decision-making: only the government and government-related experts determine environmental policy and other people only execute the policy. In the case of "false labeling of recycled paper", there existed a dispute about whether 100% recycled copy paper is environmentally effective or not. Both groups justified their opinions, using scientific data. However, these data were too simplified and lacked contexts, so it could not function as a basis of further discussion. The disputes diverged from the realities of consumers, makers of paper products, and victims of indiscriminate forest logging. Another finding in this study is that it can be an obstacle for fruitful discussion, when the government overemphasize "consensus of experts from all over the world" and hesitate to mention uncertainty existing in the policy.
|
