| Project/Area Number |
23760584
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Research Field |
Town planning/Architectural planning
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Okayama Prefectural University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2011 – 2013
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2013)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,420,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,020,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥1,820,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥420,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 行政 / 制度 / 住民参加 / 合意形成 / デザイン審査会 / 景観 / 景観保全 / 協働 / アソシアシオン / 保全 / 中間組織 / まちづくり / まちづくり運動 / 都市景観保全 / 都市環境保全 / 景観審査会 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
At first, this study investigated concrete functions and factors determining of Design Review for townscape by Hampstead Garden Suburb Trust. As results, factors were constructed from design review in an independent organization, original analysis for applications of new development, and a mediator by Residents Association. Secondly, this study focused on evaluation for conservation activities by the associations toward consensus building. The results demonstrated following; 1)when a conflict between associations and the municipal officers occurred, resolving method with direct collision would be exercised, 2)conservation activities become a reason for living, 3)when associations have technical aid from external organizations, campaign for desirable plan would strengthen, 4) conservation activities make a local authority build a platform to collaboration with residents and Association. Thus, design review for townscape with residents should take these results into consideration.
|
