A Comparative Institutional Analysis of the Responses to the Global Financial Crisis: The United Kingdom and the United States
| Project/Area Number |
23830082
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Research Activity Start-up
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Research Field |
International relations
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Kansai University (2012)
Meiji University (2011) |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
KONOE Sara 関西大学, 経済学部, 准教授 (90611921)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2011 – 2012
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2012)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,120,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥720,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 金融危機 / 比較制度分析 / 金融規制 / イギリス / 米国 / 国際政治経済学 / 国際政治経済 / 金融ガバナンス / EU経済 / 危機対応 / 経済政策 / 銀行監督 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
By comparing the response of countries, including the United Kingdom and the United States, to the 2007.2008 global financial crisis, this research examined how political systems impacted regulatory reforms in financial markets and what the implications for financial governance were. Both in a country characterized by the separation of powers (e.g. the United States) and in a country characterized by the centralization of power (e.g. the United Kingdom) regulatory reforms made progress after the financial crisis due to public pressure. Nevertheless, in the system characterized by the separation of powers, the restructuring of financial regulators has been rather difficult. In the global context of financial regulatory and supervisory integration across borders, the consolidation of financial regulatory powers at a national level has become important in order to shape the global financial architecture according to the principles of mutual recognition. Though one could assert that the United Kingdom has acted relatively quickly to take part in and lead this new trend, the assessment of the financial regulatory and supervisory structure should still depend on exactly how the regulatory structure is built and how reforms are implemented.
|
Report
(3 results)
Research Products
(14 results)
