Project/Area Number |
24330215
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
Allocation Type | Partial Multi-year Fund |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Educaion
|
Research Institution | Saitama University |
Principal Investigator |
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
FURUSATO Takashi 東海大学, 課程資格教育センター, 講師 (00610271)
HIRATSUKA Maki 法政大学, 社会学部, 教授 (10224289)
TAKAHASHI Masahiro 大正大学, 人間学部, 准教授 (10360786)
OGURI Yuko 鹿児島大学, 生涯学習教育研究センター, 准教授 (10381138)
SEKI Keiko 一橋大学, 大学院社会学研究科, 名誉教授 (20107155)
MIYAKITA Takashi 熊本学園大学, 社会福祉学部, 教授 (50112404)
SAKAINO Kenji 福島大学, 行政政策学類, 名誉教授 (50215604)
DOI Taeko 金沢大学, 学校教育系, 教授 (50447661)
TAKADA Ken 都留文科大学, 文学部, 教授 (60457900)
IWAKAWA Naoki 埼玉大学, 教育学部, 教授 (70251139)
HARAKO Eiichiro 東京学芸大学, 環境教育研究センター, 教授 (70272630)
ISHI Hiedeki 福島大学, うつくしまふくしま未来支援センター, 特任准教授 (70613230)
KATAOKA Yoko 千葉大学, 教育学部, 教授 (80226018)
HIROSE Ken-ichiro 鹿児島純心女子大学, 国際人間学部, 准教授 (80352491)
KODERA Takayuki 京都橘大学, 人間発達学部, 教授 (80460682)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2012-04-01 – 2016-03-31
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2015)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥17,550,000 (Direct Cost: ¥13,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥4,050,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥4,290,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥990,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥4,290,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥990,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥4,420,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,020,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥4,550,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,050,000)
|
Keywords | 公害教育 / 環境教育学 / 社会批判的環境教育 / 公害 / 水俣病 / 先住民 / 福島原発 / チェルノブイリ / 環境教育 / 社会教育 / チェルノブイリ原発 / ベラルーシ / 環境教育研究 / 福島 / 水俣 / カナダ / 国際研究者交流 |
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
In this study we clarified the following four points ;①Though ‘environmentalization’ of education has generated all over the world after the 1960s, ‘Kogai kyoiku’ (anti-pollution education) movement in Japan has been quite unique in its purpose, contents and participants compared with socially critical environmental education movements in other countries. ②Though radioecological education has been organized systematically after the Chernobyl NPP Accident in the Republic of Belarus and radiological education has been also promoted after Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP Accident in Japan, it is indispensable for both countries to develop a new approach based on the experiences of Kogai kyoiku movements. ③Centers for rehabilitation and health promotion which are very popular in Belarus must be very useful in Japan. It would be necessary for us to expand the field of Kogai kyoiku studies. ④We should proceed to reconstruct critically the critical approach of the theory of Kogai kyouiku.
|