| Project/Area Number |
24520033
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Philosophy/Ethics
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Ryukoku University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
SEKIZUKA Shoji 諏訪東京理科大学, 共通教育センター, 教授 (00350851)
UENOYAMA Akihiro 日本大学, 文理学, 助教 (00440024)
OKAMURA Toshifumi 大阪市立大学, 文学研究科, 研究員 (20527733)
GOROMARU Hitomi 国際基督教大学, キリスト教と文化研究所, 研究員 (30568845)
SUZUKI Katsunari 青森中央学院大学, 経営法学部, 教授 (60279487)
ITO Takao 創価大学, 文学部, 准教授 (70440237)
SAITO Satoshi 杏林大学, 外国語学部, 教授 (70442019)
TAKAHASHI Yoichiro 日本大学, 文理学部, 准教授 (80333102)
|
|---|
| Research Collaborator |
HONGO Asaka 立教大学, 非常勤講師
YAMAMOTO Keiko 東京造形大学, 准教授
TAKATSUJI Tomoyoshi 東京大学, 名誉教授
KAMATA Yasuo 関西学院大学, 総合政策学部, 教授
SUTO Norihide 大阪大学, 大学院文学研究科, 教授
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2012-04-01 – 2015-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2014)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥5,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,200,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥2,210,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥510,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,690,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥390,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 多元主義 / 普遍主義 / ニーチェ / ショーペンハウアー |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
The purpose of this research was to consider universalism and pluralism mutually in each field of theoretical philosophy, practical philosophy, and aesthetics. We have mainly focused on Nietzsche's pluralistic philosophy and Schopenhauer's universalistic philosophy.
The results of this study are 3 points below. 1. (theoretical philosophy) In order to understand the actual stability of the real world, a certain universalism is indispensable. 2. (practical philosophy) Universalism and pluralism are divided by how to estimate and understand the collectivity, and it is crucial where to place the individuality. 3. (aesthetics) The aesthetic enjoyment common to all people is impossible in fact, so the universality here remain only possibility.
|
