What should the government buy?Study on innovation and role of the government.
Project/Area Number |
24530329
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Economic policy
|
Research Institution | Aichi University |
Principal Investigator |
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
TAKEDA Yosuke 上智大学, 経済学部, 教授 (20266068)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2012-04-01 – 2015-03-31
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2014)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥5,070,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,170,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥2,600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥600,000)
|
Keywords | 財政支出乗数 / イノベーション / 法的執行 / TFP / 特化の経済性 / 空間VAR |
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
Do legal enforcements for competition policy have differential effects on innovative research and development activities? Taking into account both strategic R&D competition between incumbent and entrant, and government’s optimal choice of legal schemes, we first present a game-theoretic model of innovation and legal enforcement. Second, focusing on overseas subsidiaries of the Japanese auto-parts suppliers that have international deployments with different legal origins in locations, we use a pooled data set of the Basic Survey of Overseas Business Activities and the Basic Survey of Japanese Business Structure and Activities. It suggests that under regulation as a legal enforcement scheme instead of strict liability or negligence, even in countries with low degree of law and order, R&D activities would be more enhanced and R&D-deterrent ones be further suppressed on average. Legalenforcement for competition policy does matter for innovation.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(7 results)