Acceptance and Exclusion in Modern Japan's Custody Policy for the People with Mentally Disabled
| Project/Area Number |
24530749
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Social welfare and social work studies
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Aichi Prefectural University (2013-2014)
Kinjo Gakuin University (2012) |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2012-04-01 – 2015-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2014)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥2,730,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥630,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥390,000 (Direct Cost: ¥300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥90,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 精神病者監護法 / 精神病院法 / 保健衛生調査会 / 農村保健衛生実地調査 / 精神病者 / 内務省衛生局 / 中宮病院 / 旧民法 / 院外保護 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
Legislating the 1900’s “custody law” for the people with mentally disabled involved a dynamic relationship among the Ministry of the Interior, civil law scholars, and psychiatrists. The Ministry regarded custody as monitoring those responsible to prevent illegal confinement; scholars needed to adopt safeguards in order to compensate for the Meiji Civil Code’s deficiencies; and psychiatrists desired to include the implication of treatment in custody. In the end, such psychiatrists’ perspectives were neglected, and the custody policy was later characterized by equivalency between the “protection” concept, intentionally formed from a policy perspective, and “authoritarian enforcement-its implementation. Then the wartime regime’s (1910-1930) emphasis to “strengthen national power” eventually tilted the custody policy from protection toward public safety.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(7 results)
