| Project/Area Number |
24593239
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Fundamental nursing
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Miyazaki Prefectual Nursing University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
平山 登志子 宮崎県立看護大学, 看護学部, 助手 (60626993)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2012-04-01 – 2016-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2015)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥5,330,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,230,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,950,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥450,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,820,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥420,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 手指衛生 / 手洗い / 手指消毒 / 速乾性擦式手指消毒薬 / 石鹸 / ウォーターレス法 / 細菌 / 注意点 / 併用 / ウォータレス法 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
In this study, we examined residual bacteria on hands after cleaning with a fast-drying antiseptic handrub, either alone or after conventional hand-washing under running water. We tested 9 fast-drying antiseptic handrubs (7 standard handrubs, 2 for waterless surgical hand preparation) and 4 types of conventional hand-washing methods (one of 3 soaps or water only) with groups of 29-36 people per trial. Bacteria was lower when one of the 7 standard antiseptic handrubs, but not when the 2 for surgical hand preparation, was used alone, compared to when it was used with any type of conventional hand-washing. Among the 28 combinations, 18 had significant differences (p<0.05) in bacteria based on whether hand-washing was used. Bacteria was relatively low after cleaning with normal handwashing followed by either of the 2 types of chlorhexidine gluconate-containing (0.5 g/100 ml) surgical handrubs; this was not significantly different from when the handrub was used alone.
|
