| Project/Area Number |
24653027
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Research Field |
New fields of law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Ritsumeikan University (2014)
Ryukoku University (2012-2013) |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2012-04-01 – 2015-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2014)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥2,730,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥630,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 医事法 / 医師民事責任法 / オーストラリア / 機会喪失論 / 専門訴訟 / 相当程度の可能性 / 鑑定 / 医療過誤 / 医師民事責任 / オーストラリア法 / 医療訴訟 / コンカレント・エヴィデンス / 韓国 / ＡＤＲ / 無過失補償制度 / 国際情報交換 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
This research is conducted in the area of substantive law and procedural law. In the area of substantive law, this study found that the High Court of Australia denied the Loss-of-Chance doctrine in the judgment ruled in 2010. Comparing it with the doctrine of “Significant Possibility” (Soto Teido no Kanosei) and “Right of Expectation” (Kitaiken) adopted or referred by the Japanese Supreme Court gives valuable suggestions.
In the area of procedural law, Australian courts adopt the method called “Concurrent Evidence” which examines multiple experts simultaneously in the courtroom. Tokyo District Court Medical Case Division uses the method called “Conference Evaluation” (Conference Kantei), which is partly similar to “Concurrent Evidence”. Both method aim for same purpose making it easy for judges to understand cases and decide better.
|
