The conduct norm of omission which does not correspond to a offence by commission
| Project/Area Number |
24730062
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Research Field |
Criminal law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Kwansei Gakuin University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2012-04-01 – 2014-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2013)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥2,340,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥540,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 不作為犯 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
A crime of omission is preexisting, if someone who is obligated, do not prohibited occurrence of damage. The research so far do vetted the not genuine failure (unechte Unterlassung) as same as a genuine crime by omission that causes a case of manslaughter. Nevertheless it is important to not only examines not genuine failure, but also intentional act of genuine crime forbearance (vorsaetzliche Handlung der echten Unterlassung), which are not committal equal. This work in hand do discuss distinctions issues of validity and spuriousness bent to the crime of forbearance (Unterlassungsdelikt), definition of success and peril on the commitment of omission.
|
Report
(3 results)
Research Products
(6 results)
