| Project/Area Number |
25282186
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Partial Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Developmental mechanisms and the body works
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Musashino Art University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
Mori Toshio 武蔵野美術大学, 造形学部, 教授 (30200372)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
NAKASEKO TETSU 神戸親和女子大学, その他の研究科, 教授 (00198110)
MARUYAMA SHINJI 愛知県立大学, 公私立大学の部局等, 教授 (10157414)
NAKANISHI TAKUMI 武庫川女子大学, スポーツ健康科学部, 教授 (10259608)
TANAKA SHINJIRO 武庫川女子大学, スポーツ健康科学部, 教授 (70197432)
UNNO YUZO 山口大学, 教育学部, 教授 (30151955)
KUBO TAKESHI 日本体育大学, その他部局等, 教授 (60125698)
NORIMOTO SHIRO 熊本大学, 教育学部, 教授 (90136698)
ISHIDA TOMOMI 立命館大学, 産業社会学部, 教授 (90314715)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2013-04-01 – 2016-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2015)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥7,410,000 (Direct Cost: ¥5,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,710,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥2,210,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥510,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥2,860,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥660,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥2,340,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥540,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 体育科教育 / 運動文化論 / スポーツ活動システム / 自律的形成 / 実践的方法論 / 学習活動の対象化 / 矛盾の解決過程 / 陶冶と訓育 / 矛盾の顕在化 / 活動の構成要因 / 授業実践の方法原理 / 創発 / 発達課題 / 生活課題 / 教育課程 / 生活と文化の統一 / 意味の問い直し / 学習指導要領 / TGfU / Physical Literacy / 生涯スポーツ |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
In our study, we discussed that it was significant to understand Sports Activity Systems (SAS) as objectives in physical education and examined the didactical principles to form SAS autonomously from the points of views of the cultural characteristics and the hierarchical phases and solutions to internal contradictions of SAS.
The instructional methodology for autonomous formation of SAS in physical education is summarized as follows: ①To organize the culturally advanced SAS as subject matter ; ②to objectify contradictions of the subject matter and real SAS ; ③to objectify with each other components of SAS such as “instruments”, “rules” and “meaningful object ”; ④in the solution processes to contradictions of SAS, to encourage autonomous formation of that with both instruction and education.
|
