| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,810,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,110,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
|
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
To improve the effectiveness of Japanese administrative regulations, I conducted overseas investigations and gathered information related to application of enforcement measures and administrative organization of building supervision bureaus. In this research, I targeted abovementioned bureaus of the 16 German state capitals which have advanced legal systems to secure duty fulfillment. The results of my investigations are as follows:
Zwangsgeld is most often used as an administrative enforcement method, and is a financially efficient and practical corrective measure. Ersatzvornahme and Versiegelung are generally adopted less frequently. Geldbusse is generally used effectively to apply administrative sanctions in- and outside the applicable bureau. Local government officials who are appointed after studying for a three-year period at Verwaltungsfachhochschule, form the core of the administration, and carry out law enforcement operations without periodic personnel changes.
|
